scweb® Project

Specifics & Evaluation


Before proceeding with the quote, you will be require to complete the document Appendix A. Details of Appendix A are highlighted below:

1.         Purpose

1.1 This document details the specifics and proposed methodology used to evaluate the organisations’ requirements prior to submitting an offer.

2.         Criteria

2.1      The criteria is designed to define how to submit the most advantageous offer that best represents the Organisations.

2.2      The  SwissSCWeb AG will apply the following criteria when evaluating the applicable parts of the offer:

  • General details – An initial evaluation is made following the general details we will receive. If the Organisation does not meet our requirements further assessment will not be made. Pass/fail-
  • Financial – Whole life costs including System installation/connection and on-going maintenance, licenses & support. Other suppliers should be aware of the budget allocation for this project. On-going maintenance and support contract costs will be stated annually for a period of 5 years and fall outside of the cost budgeted for the system. Core System Cost; Additional Module Cost (included and optionals); License/s Cost/s; Interface Costs; Maintenance / software support Costs.
  • Technical – Customer Experience and Ability;  Work flow and requirement suitability;  IT requirements; Customer support and development (IT Department; Infrastructure and communication network).

3.         Evaluation Methodology

  •  Customer requirements will be appraised both qualitatively and quantitatively but SwissSCWeb reserves the right not to follow through with any requests which demonstrate an abnormally high or low budget. In these circumstances, SwissSCWeb may request further information in order to evaluate a suitable solution and may at its own discretion (following receipt of this information) decide to send the offer or not.
  •  A request shall only be accepted if it complies with the requirements set out  below .
Assessment Score Interpretation
Excellent5Exceeds the requirement: The response meets the required standard in all material respects and exceeds some or all of the major requirements. The response identifies factors that will offer potential added value, with evidence to support the response.
Good4Satisfies the requirement with minor additional benefits: The response meets the required standard in all material respects. The response identifies factors that will offer potential added value, with evidence to support the response.
Acceptable3Satisfies the requirement: The response meets the required standard in most material respects, but is lacking or inconsistent in others.
Minor Reservations2Satisfies the requirement with minor reservations: The response falls short of meeting the required standard in more than one identifiable respects.
Serious Reservations1Satisfies the requirement with major reservations: The response significantly fails to meet the required standard and/or contains significant shortcomings
Unacceptable0Does not meet the requirement: Does not comply and/or insufficient information provided. The response fails to meet the required standard.

To receive the Appendix A document, it is necessary to complete the following format indicating one of the following projects that are currently available:

  • Blood Collection
  • Blood Processing
  • Blood Storage
  • Transfusion
  • Bed-Side Therapy
  • Stem cells collection
  • Stem cells Laboratory
  • Stem cells Storage
  • Transport and Logistic
  • Onco-Hematology Therapy
  • Pharmaceutical processes

Contact form

Complete the following form to request the Appendix A
CONTACT FORM